Distinguish between the Human Development Index (HDI) and the Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index (IHDI) with special reference to India. Why is the IHDI considered a better indicator of inclusive growth?

Q. Distinguish between the Human Development Index (HDI) and the Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index (IHDI) with special reference to India. Why is the IHDI considered a better indicator of inclusive growth?

Introduction:
HDI measures average human development achievements, while IHDI adjusts it for inequality, reflecting actual distribution of welfare.


HDI vs IHDI – Key Differences

Aspect HDI IHDI
Concept Average achievements Inequality-adjusted achievements
Dimensions Health, Education, Income Same 3 dimensions
Inequality factor Ignored Incorporated (distribution-sensitive)
Nature Potential human development Actual human development
Interpretation Higher = better average Lower than HDI if inequality exists
Developed by United Nations Development Programme Same (introduced in 2010 HDR)

India: HDI vs IHDI (Key Insights)

  • HDI Rank (2023): ~0.64 (Medium human development category)
  • IHDI Value: Drops significantly (~20–25% loss due to inequality)
  • Inequality Loss: Higher than global average in education & income

Dimension-wise Inequality (India)

  • Education: Rural–urban divide, gender gap
  • Health: Inter-state disparities (e.g., Kerala vs BIMARU states)
  • Income: Top 10% holds ~57% of national income (World Inequality Report)

Example

  • Kerala: High human development + relatively low inequality
  • Uttar Pradesh/Bihar: Lower HDI + higher inequality → larger IHDI drop

Why IHDI is a Better Indicator of Inclusive Growth?

1. Captures Distribution (Equity Dimension)

  • HDI ignores who benefits
  • IHDI reflects intra-societal disparities

2. Reveals Hidden Deprivations

  • Same HDI, different inequality levels → different IHDI
  • Example: India vs countries with similar HDI but lower inequality

3. Aligns with Inclusive Growth Goals

  • Inclusive growth = growth + equity
  • IHDI integrates both → better policy guidance

4. Policy Relevance

  • Highlights need for:
    • Targeted welfare (DBT, MGNREGA)
    • Social sector spending (health, education)
  • Supports recommendations of:
    • NITI Aayog (SDG localisation)
    • World Bank (shared prosperity focus)

5. Tracks SDGs More Effectively

  • Linked to SDG-10 (Reduced Inequalities)
  • Helps monitor leave no one behind principle

Challenges Highlighted by IHDI in India

  • Regional imbalance (North–South divide)
  • Gender inequality (low FLFP, education gaps)
  • Social stratification (caste, tribe-based exclusion)
  • Urban–rural service delivery gaps

Way Forward

  • Redistributive policies: Progressive taxation, welfare targeting
  • Human capital push: NEP 2020, Ayushman Bharat
  • Regional focus: Aspirational Districts Programme
  • Gender inclusion: Skilling + employment generation

Conclusion:
IHDI, by adjusting for inequality, provides a truer picture of inclusive development, making it a superior tool for policy design in diverse societies like India.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top