Examine the evolving pattern of Centre-State financial relations in the context of planned development in India. How far have the recent reforms impacted the fiscal federalism in India?

UPSC Mains 2025 GS Paper 2 Question Paper

Q. Examine the evolving pattern of Centre-State financial relations in the context of planned development in India. How far have the recent reforms impacted the fiscal federalism in India?

Introduction:
Centre–State financial relations in India have evolved from centralized planning-led transfers to a more decentralized, rule-based fiscal federal framework, especially after recent reforms.

  1. Constitutional Basis of Fiscal Federalism
  • Articles 268–293 → distribution of taxation powers
  • Finance Commission (Art 280) → vertical & horizontal devolution
  • Seventh Schedule → Union, State, Concurrent lists
  • GST Council (Art 279A) → cooperative fiscal federalism
  1. Pattern during Planned Development Era (1950–2014)

(a) Centralized Fiscal Architecture

  • Dominance of Planning Commission
  • Discretionary grants (Plan vs Non-Plan distinction)
  • States dependent on Centre → vertical imbalance

(b) Transfer Mechanisms

  • Finance Commission → statutory transfers
  • Planning Commission → plan grants, CSS

(c) Issues

  • Overlap & inefficiency (dual channels)
  • Conditional transfers limiting State autonomy
  • Politicization of grants
  1. Post-Reform Phase (Post-2014): Key Changes

(a) End of Planning Commission

  • Replaced by NITI Aayog
  • Shift from top-down planning → cooperative federalism

(b) Finance Commission Empowerment

  • 14th Finance Commission:
    • Tax devolution ↑ from 32% → 42%
  • 15th Finance Commission:
    • Maintained ~41% (post J&K reorganization)

→ Strengthened formula-based, predictable transfers

(c) GST Regime

  • Introduced via 101st Constitutional Amendment (2016)
  • Subsumed multiple taxes → harmonized indirect taxation

Features:

  • GST Council → joint decision-making body
  • Compensation to states for revenue loss (5 years)

(d) Rationalization of CSS

  • Reduced number of Centrally Sponsored Schemes
  • Increased flexibility to States
  1. Impact on Fiscal Federalism

Positive Outcomes

  • State fiscal autonomy (higher tax devolution)
  • Strengthened cooperative federalism (GST Council)
  • Reduced discretionary transfers
  • Improved fiscal transparency & predictability

Concerns / Limitations

  • GST constraints:
    • Limited taxation powers of States
    • Compensation delays → fiscal stress
  • Centrally Sponsored Schemes still conditional
  • Rising cess & surcharge (not shareable with States) → reduces divisible pool
  • Increasing off-budget borrowings
  1. Data / Evidence
  • States’ share in central taxes ↑ significantly post-14th FC
  • GST accounts for ~50% of indirect tax revenue
  • Cesses & surcharges ~15–20% of gross tax revenue (reducing devolution pool)
  1. Overall Assessment
  • Shift from:
    • Centralized, discretionary model → rule-based fiscal federalism
  • But evolving towards “cooperative yet controlled federalism”
  1. Way Forward
  • Rationalize cess & surcharge usage
  • Ensure timely GST compensation / reforms
  • Strengthen State fiscal capacity
  • Enhance role of Inter-State Council & NITI Aayog

Conclusion:
Recent reforms have significantly strengthened fiscal federalism, yet persistent structural and policy challenges require continuous calibration to ensure true cooperative and balanced Centre–State financial relations

UPSC MAINS GS II Question Paper with Explanation PDF Download here

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top